![]() I would never use a ukulele as a way to somehow replace a recording of a traditional guitar, even though it's more convenient. I need a nice one, that plays and responds like I'd expect a guitar to. That a ukulele is smaller is actually the opposite of what I'm looking for. If you hand a professional guitarist a ukulele, and tell them it's a proper guitar, they will probably laugh at you. You can also burst or drop frames from video but ick, shooting professional photos with a phone as is seems unnecessarily uncomfortable to me.Ī ukulele is easy to carry around, but is pretty pathetic sounding compared to a proper acoustic guitar when it comes time to actually play songs.įor the average consumer who doesn't know how to play music at all, maybe the ukulele would be a nice option. Sure you have voice controls or shutter timmers but timmers are not ideal in most shooting conditions from my experience, unless you have humans. I personally use a Note so the S pen works great as a built in remote shutter (especially nice for tripod shots) but I can't for the life of me get good shots with the UI shutter or even volume/side button rockers. Maybe I'm getting old but I find it difficult to shoot good photos even with the bulkiest of phone cases, while also being able to hit the shutter without shifting my camera drastically. I did see use of a small tripod at one point and a mount to a vehicle but for the hands, nothing. I don't even mean with all sorts of nifty expensive stabilizers, just something to hold onto the phone and shoot better. The more surprising aspect to this review (maybe I missed this part, I skimmed) is how there wasn't much discussed about having a bigger and more ergonomic hand mount for the phone when shooting. That said, we've come a long way, and I am impressed. Most photos taken on a mobile phone completely fall apart when viewed on a big screen, as it then becomes obvious how much of a smudge they are. Mobile screens increasingly are OLED for deep contrast, wide gamut for richer colors, and have a pixel density that is a multiple of desktop screens. As the subjects themselves are unexciting, it would be better suitable to analyze technical image quality.Īnother interesting aspect of analyzing the quality of mobile photography is that counter intuitively, mobile phone screens are drastically superior to most desktop monitors. The output will be visually attractive and you'd not easily notice any lack of technical attractiveness.Ĭompare this to photographing technical test charts or you walking the dog at night. The subjects, scenery and light conditions are naturally very beautiful on their own. It's near impossible to make ugly photos in Tanzania, even with low-end skills or gear. It's not just in the competency of the photographer, but also in the choice of subjects. Whilst I will in fact get this phone, this review unintentionally manipulates you into a favorable opinion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |